Beasley Broadcast Group Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio Growth & History (BBGI)
Beasley Broadcast Group's debt-to-ebitda ratio was 14.29 for fiscal 2024.
View full Beasley Broadcast Group company overviewBeasley Broadcast Group annual debt-to-ebitda ratio history
| Fiscal year | Period ended | Debt-to-EBITDA ratio | Change | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2024-12-31 | 14.29 | — | — |
| 2021 | 2021-12-31 | 14.57 | −80.45 | −84.66% |
| 2020 | 2020-12-31 | 95.02 | 88.39 | +1332.72% |
| 2019 | 2019-12-31 | 6.63 | 0.46 | +7.46% |
| 2018 | 2018-12-31 | 6.17 | 2.80 | +83.09% |
| 2017 | 2017-12-31 | 3.37 | −0.54 | −13.70% |
| 2016 | 2016-12-31 | 3.91 | −1.49 | −27.55% |
| 2015 | 2015-12-31 | 5.39 | −6.69 | −55.38% |
| 2014 | 2014-12-31 | 12.08 | 2.00 | +19.82% |
| 2013 | 2013-12-31 | 10.08 | 6.14 | +155.71% |
| 2012 | 2012-12-31 | 3.94 | −0.87 | −18.07% |
| 2011 | 2011-12-31 | 4.81 | −0.75 | −13.44% |
| 2010 | 2010-12-31 | 5.56 | — | — |
Beasley Broadcast Group quarterly debt-to-ebitda ratio
| Fiscal quarter | Period ended | Debt-to-EBITDA ratio | Change | YoY change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q3 2025 | 2025-09-30 | 17.26 | 1.89 | +12.30% |
| Q2 2025 | 2025-06-30 | 15.58 | — | — |
| Q1 2025 | 2025-03-31 | 13.71 | — | — |
| Q4 2024 | 2024-12-31 | 14.29 | — | — |
| Q3 2024 | 2024-09-30 | 15.37 | — | — |
| Q3 2022 | 2022-09-30 | 30.60 | 20.95 | +217.15% |
| Q2 2022 | 2022-06-30 | 29.26 | 18.33 | +167.77% |
| Q1 2022 | 2022-03-31 | 15.02 | −27.50 | −64.68% |
| Q4 2021 | 2021-12-31 | 14.57 | −80.45 | −84.66% |
| Q3 2021 | 2021-09-30 | 9.65 | — | — |
| Q2 2021 | 2021-06-30 | 10.93 | −52.94 | −82.89% |
| Q1 2021 | 2021-03-31 | 42.52 | 33.05 | +348.66% |
| Q4 2020 | 2020-12-31 | 95.02 | 88.39 | +1332.72% |
| Q2 2020 | 2020-06-30 | 63.87 | 57.98 | +985.17% |
| Q1 2020 | 2020-03-31 | 9.48 | 3.51 | +58.89% |
| Q4 2019 | 2019-12-31 | 6.63 | 0.46 | +7.46% |
| Q3 2019 | 2019-09-30 | 6.02 | 0.95 | +18.65% |
| Q2 2019 | 2019-06-30 | 5.89 | 1.77 | +42.98% |
| Q1 2019 | 2019-03-31 | 5.97 | 1.98 | +49.61% |
| Q4 2018 | 2018-12-31 | 6.17 | 2.80 | +83.09% |
| Q3 2018 | 2018-09-30 | 5.07 | 2.78 | +121.15% |
| Q2 2018 | 2018-06-30 | 4.12 | 1.48 | +56.38% |
| Q1 2018 | 2018-03-31 | 3.99 | 0.86 | +27.34% |
| Q4 2017 | 2017-12-31 | 3.37 | −0.54 | −13.70% |
| Q3 2017 | 2017-09-30 | 2.29 | −1.61 | −41.29% |
| Q2 2017 | 2017-06-30 | 2.63 | −2.13 | −44.69% |
| Q1 2017 | 2017-03-31 | 3.13 | −1.71 | −35.31% |
| Q4 2016 | 2016-12-31 | 3.91 | −1.49 | −27.55% |
| Q3 2016 | 2016-09-30 | 3.91 | −6.45 | −62.26% |
| Q2 2016 | 2016-06-30 | 4.76 | −5.20 | −52.21% |
| Q1 2016 | 2016-03-31 | 4.84 | −4.26 | −46.83% |
| Q4 2015 | 2015-12-31 | 5.39 | −6.69 | −55.38% |
| Q3 2015 | 2015-09-30 | 10.35 | −13.49 | −56.58% |
| Q2 2015 | 2015-06-30 | 9.96 | −10.55 | −51.44% |
| Q1 2015 | 2015-03-31 | 9.10 | −8.75 | −49.02% |
| Q4 2014 | 2014-12-31 | 12.08 | 2.00 | +19.82% |
| Q3 2014 | 2014-09-30 | 23.85 | 19.41 | +437.31% |
| Q2 2014 | 2014-06-30 | 20.51 | 16.72 | +440.86% |
| Q1 2014 | 2014-03-31 | 17.86 | 13.98 | +360.79% |
| Q4 2013 | 2013-12-31 | 10.08 | 6.14 | +155.71% |
| Q3 2013 | 2013-09-30 | 4.44 | 0.27 | +6.42% |
| Q2 2013 | 2013-06-30 | 3.79 | −0.55 | −12.66% |
| Q1 2013 | 2013-03-31 | 3.88 | −0.78 | −16.70% |
| Q4 2012 | 2012-12-31 | 3.94 | −0.87 | −18.07% |
| Q3 2012 | 2012-09-30 | 4.17 | — | — |
| Q2 2012 | 2012-06-30 | 4.34 | — | — |
| Q1 2012 | 2012-03-31 | 4.65 | — | — |
| Q4 2011 | 2011-12-31 | 4.81 | — | — |
Beasley Broadcast Group debt-to-ebitda ratio trends
Over the last five fiscal years, Beasley Broadcast Group's debt-to-ebitda ratio increased from 6.63 to 14.29, a change of 7.66. The latest reported quarter, Q3 2025, shows 17.26.
What the debt-to-EBITDA ratio means
Debt-to-EBITDA compares interest-bearing debt with operating earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. It is commonly used to assess leverage, but it is generally unsuitable for banks and other financial companies.
How debt-to-EBITDA is calculated
TickerStat divides period-end total debt by annual EBITDA. Quarterly observations use trailing-12-month EBITDA. Periods with zero or negative EBITDA are excluded because the leverage multiple would not be meaningful. Fiscal periods can differ from calendar years, so exact period-end dates are included.
Review Beasley Broadcast Group source filings ↗