Nordic American Tankers annual debt-to-ebitda ratio
2009
2010
2012
2014
2015
2016
2018
2019
2020
2022
2023
2024
2025
Nordic American Tankers Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio Growth & History (NAT)
Nordic American Tankers's debt-to-ebitda ratio was 4.08 for fiscal 2025.
View full Nordic American Tankers company overviewNordic American Tankers annual debt-to-ebitda ratio history
| Fiscal year | Period ended | Debt-to-EBITDA ratio | Change | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2025-12-31 | 4.08 | 2.05 | +101.66% |
| 2024 | 2024-12-31 | 2.02 | 0.34 | +20.13% |
| 2023 | 2023-12-31 | 1.68 | −1.64 | −49.36% |
| 2022 | 2022-12-31 | 3.32 | — | — |
| 2020 | 2020-12-31 | 2.40 | −1.77 | −42.46% |
| 2019 | 2019-12-31 | 4.17 | −15.60 | −78.92% |
| 2018 | 2018-12-31 | 19.77 | — | — |
| 2016 | 2016-12-31 | 3.07 | 1.53 | +99.31% |
| 2015 | 2015-12-31 | 1.54 | −1.76 | −53.32% |
| 2014 | 2014-12-31 | 3.30 | — | — |
| 2012 | 2012-12-31 | 189.83 | — | — |
| 2010 | 2010-12-31 | 1.18 | 1.18 | — |
| 2009 | 2009-12-31 | 0.00 | — | — |
Nordic American Tankers quarterly debt-to-ebitda ratio
Q4.25
Q1.26
Q2.26
| Fiscal quarter | Period ended | Debt-to-EBITDA ratio | Change | YoY change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 2026 | 2026-06-30 | 2.57 | — | — |
| Q1 2026 | 2026-03-31 | 4.58 | — | — |
| Q4 2025 | 2025-12-31 | 8.96 | — | — |
Nordic American Tankers debt-to-ebitda ratio trends
Over the last five fiscal years, Nordic American Tankers's debt-to-ebitda ratio increased from 2.40 to 4.08, a change of 1.68. The latest reported quarter, Q2 2026, shows 2.57.
About the metric
What the debt-to-EBITDA ratio means
Debt-to-EBITDA compares interest-bearing debt with operating earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. It is commonly used to assess leverage, but it is generally unsuitable for banks and other financial companies.
Calculation and source
How debt-to-EBITDA is calculated
TickerStat divides period-end total debt by annual EBITDA. Quarterly observations use trailing-12-month EBITDA. Periods with zero or negative EBITDA are excluded because the leverage multiple would not be meaningful. Fiscal periods can differ from calendar years, so exact period-end dates are included.
Review Nordic American Tankers source filings ↗