North American Construction Group Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio Growth & History (NOA)
North American Construction Group's debt-to-ebitda ratio was 2.81 for fiscal 2025.
View full North American Construction Group company overviewNorth American Construction Group annual debt-to-ebitda ratio history
| Fiscal year | Period ended | Debt-to-EBITDA ratio | Change | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2025-12-31 | 2.81 | 0.40 | +16.71% |
| 2024 | 2024-12-31 | 2.40 | −0.55 | −18.61% |
| 2023 | 2023-12-31 | 2.95 | 0.87 | +41.83% |
| 2022 | 2022-12-31 | 2.08 | — | — |
| 2018 | 2018-12-31 | 4.33 | 1.97 | +83.74% |
| 2017 | 2017-12-31 | 2.36 | 0.10 | +4.52% |
| 2016 | 2016-12-31 | 2.25 | −0.32 | −12.44% |
| 2015 | 2015-12-31 | 2.58 | 0.22 | +9.43% |
| 2014 | 2014-12-31 | 2.35 | −1.59 | −40.31% |
| 2013 | 2013-12-31 | 3.94 | −11.21 | −73.98% |
| 2012 · Mar 31 | 2013-03-31 | 16.31 | 5.77 | +54.76% |
| 2012 · Dec 31 | 2012-12-31 | 15.15 | — | — |
| 2011 | 2012-03-31 | 10.54 | −2.67 | −20.20% |
| 2010 | 2011-03-31 | 13.21 | — | — |
North American Construction Group quarterly debt-to-ebitda ratio
| Fiscal quarter | Period ended | Debt-to-EBITDA ratio | Change | YoY change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 2026 | 2026-06-30 | 3.54 | — | — |
| Q1 2026 | 2026-03-31 | 2.93 | — | — |
| Q4 2025 | 2025-12-31 | 2.79 | — | — |
North American Construction Group debt-to-ebitda ratio trends
Between the periods ended 2011-03-31 and 2025-12-31, North American Construction Group's debt-to-ebitda ratio decreased from 13.21 to 2.81, a change of −10.40. The latest reported quarter, Q2 2026, shows 3.54.
What the debt-to-EBITDA ratio means
Debt-to-EBITDA compares interest-bearing debt with operating earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. It is commonly used to assess leverage, but it is generally unsuitable for banks and other financial companies.
How debt-to-EBITDA is calculated
TickerStat divides period-end total debt by annual EBITDA. Quarterly observations use trailing-12-month EBITDA. Periods with zero or negative EBITDA are excluded because the leverage multiple would not be meaningful. Fiscal periods can differ from calendar years, so exact period-end dates are included.
Review North American Construction Group source filings ↗