Trip.com Group Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio Growth & History (TCOM)
Trip.com Group's debt-to-ebitda ratio was 1.93 for fiscal 2025.
View full Trip.com Group company overviewTrip.com Group annual debt-to-ebitda ratio history
| Fiscal year | Period ended | Debt-to-EBITDA ratio | Change | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2025-12-31 | 1.93 | −0.79 | −29.18% |
| 2024 | 2024-12-31 | 2.72 | −1.09 | −28.71% |
| 2023 | 2023-12-31 | 3.81 | −60.99 | −94.12% |
| 2022 | 2022-12-31 | 64.80 | — | — |
| 2019 | 2019-12-31 | 9.00 | −7.79 | −46.41% |
| 2018 | 2018-12-31 | 16.78 | 4.88 | +40.96% |
| 2017 | 2017-12-31 | 11.91 | — | — |
| 2015 | 2015-12-31 | 44.70 | −367.78 | −89.16% |
| 2014 | 2014-12-31 | 412.47 | 405.75 | +6030.48% |
| 2013 | 2013-12-31 | 6.73 | 4.63 | +220.76% |
| 2012 | 2012-12-31 | 2.10 | — | — |
Trip.com Group quarterly debt-to-ebitda ratio
| Fiscal quarter | Period ended | Debt-to-EBITDA ratio | Change | YoY change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 2026 | 2026-03-31 | 0.80 | — | — |
| Q4 2025 | 2025-12-31 | 0.80 | — | — |
Trip.com Group debt-to-ebitda ratio trends
Between the periods ended 2012-12-31 and 2025-12-31, Trip.com Group's debt-to-ebitda ratio decreased from 2.10 to 1.93, a change of −0.17. The latest reported quarter, Q1 2026, shows 0.80.
What the debt-to-EBITDA ratio means
Debt-to-EBITDA compares interest-bearing debt with operating earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. It is commonly used to assess leverage, but it is generally unsuitable for banks and other financial companies.
How debt-to-EBITDA is calculated
TickerStat divides period-end total debt by annual EBITDA. Quarterly observations use trailing-12-month EBITDA. Periods with zero or negative EBITDA are excluded because the leverage multiple would not be meaningful. Fiscal periods can differ from calendar years, so exact period-end dates are included.
Review Trip.com Group source filings ↗Community posts
Trip.com reports quarterly loss after antitrust penalty
Trip.com ($TCOM) reported second-quarter revenue of RMB15.7 billion, up 6% from a year earlier but down 3% sequentially. The group recorded a net loss of RMB2.4 billion, compared with a RMB4.9 billion profit a year earlier, after recognizin ...