Twin Disc annual debt-to-ebitda ratio
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2018
2019
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Twin Disc Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio Growth & History (TWIN)
Twin Disc's debt-to-ebitda ratio was 1.48 for fiscal 2026.
View full Twin Disc company overviewTwin Disc annual debt-to-ebitda ratio history
| Fiscal year | Period ended | Debt-to-EBITDA ratio | Change | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 2026-06-30 | 1.48 | −0.76 | −33.80% |
| 2025 | 2025-06-30 | 2.24 | −0.01 | −0.48% |
| 2024 | 2024-06-30 | 2.25 | 0.80 | +55.46% |
| 2023 | 2023-06-30 | 1.45 | −1.19 | −45.18% |
| 2022 | 2022-06-30 | 2.64 | — | — |
| 2019 | 2019-06-30 | 2.05 | 1.55 | +309.21% |
| 2018 | 2018-06-30 | 0.50 | — | — |
| 2015 | 2015-06-30 | 0.54 | −0.40 | −42.85% |
| 2014 | 2014-06-30 | 0.94 | −0.36 | −27.69% |
| 2013 | 2013-06-30 | 1.30 | 0.72 | +125.35% |
| 2012 | 2012-06-30 | 0.58 | −0.09 | −13.18% |
| 2011 | 2011-06-30 | 0.67 | — | — |
Twin Disc quarterly debt-to-ebitda ratio
Q4.11
Q1.12
Q2.12
Q3.12
Q4.12
Q1.13
Q2.13
Q3.13
Q4.13
Q1.14
Q2.14
Q3.14
Q4.14
Q1.15
Q2.15
Q3.15
Q4.15
Q1.16
Q2.16
Q1.18
Q2.18
Q3.18
Q4.18
Q1.19
Q2.19
Q3.19
Q4.19
Q1.20
Q2.20
Q3.21
Q1.22
Q2.22
Q3.22
Q4.22
Q1.23
Q2.23
Q3.23
Q4.23
Q2.24
Q3.24
Q4.25
Q1.26
Q2.26
Q3.26
Q4.26
| Fiscal quarter | Period ended | Debt-to-EBITDA ratio | Change | YoY change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q4 2026 | 2026-06-30 | 1.43 | −0.81 | −36.15% |
| Q3 2026 | 2026-03-27 | 2.20 | — | — |
| Q2 2026 | 2025-12-26 | 2.50 | — | — |
| Q1 2026 | 2025-09-26 | 2.43 | — | — |
| Q4 2025 | 2025-06-30 | 2.24 | — | — |
| Q3 2024 | 2024-03-29 | 1.48 | −0.50 | −25.14% |
| Q2 2024 | 2023-12-29 | 1.34 | −0.84 | −38.61% |
| Q4 2023 | 2023-06-30 | 1.45 | −1.19 | −45.18% |
| Q3 2023 | 2023-03-31 | 1.97 | −4.29 | −68.48% |
| Q2 2023 | 2022-12-30 | 2.18 | −4.71 | −68.37% |
| Q1 2023 | 2022-09-30 | 3.53 | −6.44 | −64.58% |
| Q4 2022 | 2022-06-30 | 2.64 | — | — |
| Q3 2022 | 2022-03-25 | 6.26 | −17.00 | −73.07% |
| Q2 2022 | 2021-12-31 | 6.89 | — | — |
| Q1 2022 | 2021-09-24 | 9.98 | — | — |
| Q3 2021 | 2021-03-26 | 23.26 | — | — |
| Q2 2020 | 2019-12-27 | 11.61 | 9.74 | +519.97% |
| Q1 2020 | 2019-09-27 | 3.80 | 1.90 | +100.29% |
| Q4 2019 | 2019-06-30 | 2.05 | 1.55 | +309.21% |
| Q3 2019 | 2019-03-29 | 1.75 | 1.29 | +279.71% |
| Q2 2019 | 2018-12-28 | 1.87 | 1.23 | +192.30% |
| Q1 2019 | 2018-09-28 | 1.90 | −9.76 | −83.74% |
| Q4 2018 | 2018-06-30 | 0.50 | — | — |
| Q3 2018 | 2018-03-30 | 0.46 | — | — |
| Q2 2018 | 2017-12-29 | 0.64 | — | — |
| Q1 2018 | 2017-09-29 | 11.66 | — | — |
| Q2 2016 | 2015-12-25 | 6.39 | 5.75 | +898.66% |
| Q1 2016 | 2015-09-25 | 1.16 | 0.09 | +8.12% |
| Q4 2015 | 2015-06-30 | 0.54 | −0.40 | −42.85% |
| Q3 2015 | 2015-03-27 | 0.42 | −1.03 | −71.16% |
| Q2 2015 | 2014-12-26 | 0.64 | −0.54 | −45.99% |
| Q1 2015 | 2014-09-26 | 1.08 | −0.05 | −4.41% |
| Q4 2014 | 2014-06-30 | 0.94 | −0.36 | −27.69% |
| Q3 2014 | 2014-03-28 | 1.45 | 0.04 | +3.09% |
| Q2 2014 | 2013-12-27 | 1.18 | 0.33 | +38.26% |
| Q1 2014 | 2013-09-27 | 1.12 | 0.23 | +25.82% |
| Q4 2013 | 2013-06-30 | 1.30 | 0.72 | +125.35% |
| Q3 2013 | 2013-03-29 | 1.41 | 0.71 | +100.62% |
| Q2 2013 | 2012-12-28 | 0.86 | 0.15 | +21.68% |
| Q1 2013 | 2012-09-28 | 0.89 | 0.15 | +19.46% |
| Q4 2012 | 2012-06-30 | 0.58 | −0.09 | −13.18% |
| Q3 2012 | 2012-03-30 | 0.70 | — | — |
| Q2 2012 | 2011-12-30 | 0.70 | — | — |
| Q1 2012 | 2011-09-30 | 0.75 | — | — |
| Q4 2011 | 2011-06-30 | 0.67 | — | — |
Twin Disc debt-to-ebitda ratio trends
Between the periods ended 2011-06-30 and 2026-06-30, Twin Disc's debt-to-ebitda ratio increased from 0.67 to 1.48, a change of 0.81. The latest reported quarter, Q4 2026, shows 1.43.
About the metric
What the debt-to-EBITDA ratio means
Debt-to-EBITDA compares interest-bearing debt with operating earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. It is commonly used to assess leverage, but it is generally unsuitable for banks and other financial companies.
Calculation and source
How debt-to-EBITDA is calculated
TickerStat divides period-end total debt by annual EBITDA. Quarterly observations use trailing-12-month EBITDA. Periods with zero or negative EBITDA are excluded because the leverage multiple would not be meaningful. Fiscal periods can differ from calendar years, so exact period-end dates are included.
Review Twin Disc source filings ↗