Salesforce annual debt-to-ebitda ratio
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Salesforce Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio Growth & History (CRM)
Salesforce's debt-to-ebitda ratio was 1.86 for fiscal 2026.
View full Salesforce company overviewSalesforce annual debt-to-ebitda ratio history
| Fiscal year | Period ended | Debt-to-EBITDA ratio | Change | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 2026-01-31 | 1.86 | 0.39 | +26.32% |
| 2025 | 2025-01-31 | 1.47 | −0.75 | −33.71% |
| 2024 | 2024-01-31 | 2.22 | −5.48 | −71.17% |
| 2023 | 2023-01-31 | 7.70 | −4.02 | −34.33% |
| 2022 | 2022-01-31 | 11.72 | 5.52 | +88.98% |
| 2021 | 2021-01-31 | 6.20 | −2.12 | −25.46% |
| 2020 | 2020-01-31 | 8.32 | 4.96 | +147.83% |
| 2019 | 2019-01-31 | 3.36 | 1.15 | +52.30% |
| 2018 | 2018-01-31 | 2.20 | −0.28 | −11.22% |
| 2017 | 2017-01-31 | 2.48 | 2.48 | — |
| 2016 | 2016-01-31 | 0.00 | 0.00 | — |
| 2015 | 2015-01-31 | 0.00 | −9.56 | — |
| 2014 | 2014-01-31 | 9.56 | 3.46 | +56.59% |
| 2013 | 2013-01-31 | 6.11 | 1.46 | +31.35% |
| 2012 | 2012-01-31 | 4.65 | 4.50 | +3060.78% |
| 2011 | 2011-01-31 | 0.15 | 0.07 | +83.77% |
| 2010 | 2010-01-31 | 0.08 | 0.00 | +4.81% |
| 2009 | 2009-01-31 | 0.08 | — | — |
Salesforce quarterly debt-to-ebitda ratio
Q4.10
Q1.11
Q2.11
Q3.11
Q4.11
Q1.12
Q2.12
Q3.12
Q4.12
Q1.13
Q2.13
Q3.13
Q4.13
Q1.14
Q2.14
Q3.14
Q4.14
Q1.15
Q2.15
Q3.15
Q4.15
Q1.16
Q2.16
Q3.16
Q4.16
Q1.17
Q2.17
Q3.17
Q4.17
Q1.18
Q2.18
Q3.18
Q4.18
Q1.19
Q2.19
Q3.19
Q4.19
Q1.20
Q2.20
Q3.20
Q4.20
Q1.21
Q2.21
Q3.21
Q4.21
Q1.22
Q2.22
Q3.22
Q4.22
Q1.23
Q2.23
Q3.23
Q4.23
Q1.24
Q2.24
Q3.24
Q4.24
Q1.25
Q2.25
Q3.25
Q4.25
Q1.26
Q2.26
Q3.26
Q4.26
Q1.27
Q2.27
| Fiscal quarter | Period ended | Debt-to-EBITDA ratio | Change | YoY change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 2027 | 2026-07-31 | 4.14 | 2.81 | +210.95% |
| Q1 2027 | 2026-04-30 | 4.22 | 2.79 | +195.11% |
| Q4 2026 | 2026-01-31 | 1.86 | 0.39 | +26.32% |
| Q3 2026 | 2025-10-31 | 1.27 | −0.32 | −19.96% |
| Q2 2026 | 2025-07-31 | 1.33 | −0.32 | −19.56% |
| Q1 2026 | 2025-04-30 | 1.43 | −0.47 | −24.87% |
| Q4 2025 | 2025-01-31 | 1.47 | −0.75 | −33.71% |
| Q3 2025 | 2024-10-31 | 1.58 | −1.23 | −43.67% |
| Q2 2025 | 2024-07-31 | 1.66 | −1.86 | −52.88% |
| Q1 2025 | 2024-04-30 | 1.90 | −3.29 | −63.34% |
| Q4 2024 | 2024-01-31 | 2.22 | −5.48 | −71.17% |
| Q3 2024 | 2023-10-31 | 2.81 | −6.57 | −70.06% |
| Q2 2024 | 2023-07-31 | 3.52 | −8.81 | −71.47% |
| Q1 2024 | 2023-04-30 | 5.19 | −7.72 | −59.79% |
| Q4 2023 | 2023-01-31 | 7.70 | −4.02 | −34.33% |
| Q3 2023 | 2022-10-31 | 9.38 | 1.77 | +23.32% |
| Q2 2023 | 2022-07-31 | 12.32 | 3.46 | +38.98% |
| Q1 2023 | 2022-04-30 | 12.92 | 8.88 | +219.65% |
| Q4 2022 | 2022-01-31 | 11.72 | 5.52 | +88.98% |
| Q3 2022 | 2021-10-31 | 7.60 | 2.22 | +41.22% |
| Q2 2022 | 2021-07-31 | 8.87 | 2.25 | +33.98% |
| Q1 2022 | 2021-04-30 | 4.04 | −5.93 | −59.48% |
| Q4 2021 | 2021-01-31 | 6.20 | −2.12 | −25.46% |
| Q3 2021 | 2020-10-31 | 5.38 | 1.51 | +38.89% |
| Q2 2021 | 2020-07-31 | 6.62 | 1.86 | +39.03% |
| Q1 2021 | 2020-04-30 | 9.97 | 4.35 | +77.42% |
| Q4 2020 | 2020-01-31 | 8.32 | 4.96 | +147.83% |
| Q3 2020 | 2019-10-31 | 3.88 | 0.42 | +12.31% |
| Q2 2020 | 2019-07-31 | 4.76 | 1.29 | +37.13% |
| Q1 2020 | 2019-04-30 | 5.62 | 2.43 | +76.06% |
| Q4 2019 | 2019-01-31 | 3.36 | 1.15 | +52.30% |
| Q3 2019 | 2018-10-31 | 3.45 | 2.33 | +208.41% |
| Q2 2019 | 2018-07-31 | 3.47 | 2.15 | +163.44% |
| Q1 2019 | 2018-04-30 | 3.19 | 1.88 | +142.70% |
| Q4 2018 | 2018-01-31 | 2.20 | −0.28 | −11.22% |
| Q3 2018 | 2017-10-31 | 1.12 | 1.12 | — |
| Q2 2018 | 2017-07-31 | 1.32 | 1.32 | — |
| Q1 2018 | 2017-04-30 | 1.32 | 1.32 | — |
| Q4 2017 | 2017-01-31 | 2.48 | 2.48 | — |
| Q3 2017 | 2016-10-31 | 0.00 | 0.00 | — |
| Q2 2017 | 2016-07-31 | 0.00 | 0.00 | — |
| Q1 2017 | 2016-04-30 | 0.00 | 0.00 | — |
| Q4 2016 | 2016-01-31 | 0.00 | 0.00 | — |
| Q3 2016 | 2015-10-31 | 0.00 | −0.78 | — |
| Q2 2016 | 2015-07-31 | 0.00 | −3.21 | — |
| Q1 2016 | 2015-04-30 | 0.00 | −4.32 | — |
| Q4 2015 | 2015-01-31 | 0.00 | −9.56 | — |
| Q3 2015 | 2014-10-31 | 0.78 | −5.13 | −86.82% |
| Q2 2015 | 2014-07-31 | 3.21 | −3.21 | −49.93% |
| Q1 2015 | 2014-04-30 | 4.32 | −1.06 | −19.70% |
| Q4 2014 | 2014-01-31 | 9.56 | 3.46 | +56.59% |
| Q3 2014 | 2013-10-31 | 5.91 | −0.07 | −1.09% |
| Q2 2014 | 2013-07-31 | 6.42 | 1.86 | +40.77% |
| Q1 2014 | 2013-04-30 | 5.38 | 4.94 | +1141.27% |
| Q4 2013 | 2013-01-31 | 6.11 | 1.46 | +31.35% |
| Q3 2013 | 2012-10-31 | 5.98 | 0.03 | +0.50% |
| Q2 2013 | 2012-07-31 | 4.56 | −0.06 | −1.32% |
| Q1 2013 | 2012-04-30 | 0.43 | −3.40 | −88.70% |
| Q4 2012 | 2012-01-31 | 4.65 | 4.50 | +3060.78% |
| Q3 2012 | 2011-10-31 | 5.95 | 5.80 | +3958.72% |
| Q2 2012 | 2011-07-31 | 4.62 | 4.54 | +5594.70% |
| Q1 2012 | 2011-04-30 | 3.83 | 3.76 | +5537.71% |
| Q4 2011 | 2011-01-31 | 0.15 | 0.07 | +83.77% |
| Q3 2011 | 2010-10-31 | 0.15 | — | — |
| Q2 2011 | 2010-07-31 | 0.08 | — | — |
| Q1 2011 | 2010-04-30 | 0.07 | — | — |
| Q4 2010 | 2010-01-31 | 0.08 | — | — |
Salesforce debt-to-ebitda ratio trends
Over the last five fiscal years, Salesforce's debt-to-ebitda ratio decreased from 6.20 to 1.86, a change of −4.34. The latest reported quarter, Q2 2027, shows 4.14.
About the metric
What the debt-to-EBITDA ratio means
Debt-to-EBITDA compares interest-bearing debt with operating earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. It is commonly used to assess leverage, but it is generally unsuitable for banks and other financial companies.
Calculation and source
How debt-to-EBITDA is calculated
TickerStat divides period-end total debt by annual EBITDA. Quarterly observations use trailing-12-month EBITDA. Periods with zero or negative EBITDA are excluded because the leverage multiple would not be meaningful. Fiscal periods can differ from calendar years, so exact period-end dates are included.
Review Salesforce source filings ↗Community posts
Salesforce completes its acquisition of customer-service AI company Fin
Salesforce ($CRM) completed its acquisition of Fin, the customer-service AI business formerly known as Intercom. Fin serves more than 30,000 companies and develops AI agents and models for customer support. The acquisition brings another es ...